Is radiometric dating accurate and reliable accounting
Setterfield yesthat geology is in basic harmony with the bible what has happened was that the strata of the himalayas was laid down under water in the period from the cambrian about 540 million atomic years to the cretaceous ending about 65 million atomic years ago.
Jpss is the next generation of us civil operational polarorbiting satellites and includes suomi npp the jpss program including agreements with eumetsat jaxa and dod.
Evolution deniers often argue by the use of ations this document demonstrates the fallacies of arguing by ation and the various tricks of the trade to.
time in physics is defined by its measurement time is what a clock reads in classical nonrelativistic physics it is a scalar quantity and like length mass and charge is usually described as a fundamental quantitytime can be combined mathematically with other physical quantities to derive other concepts such as motion kinetic energy and timedependent fields.
Potassiumargon dates of recent mt ngauruhoe lava flows as you can see from the dates in the above table the lava flows that were less than 55 years old were given dates from 267000 years to 35 million plus or minus 20 thousand years.
answerscom is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want.
history from greek ἱστορία historia meaning inquiry knowledge acquired by investigation is the study of the past as it is described in written documents events occurring before written record are considered prehistoryit is an umbrella term that relates to past events as well as the memory discovery collection organization presentation and interpretation of information.
Thank you for this very informative and helpful i have always been bothered by the acceptance of the square root of minus one i as a necessity because maths depends upon the truth that a negative times a negative is a positive.
Kalba youve committed a logical fallacy in arguing against a different logical fallacy the no true scotsman argument is a way to convert a counterexample to your argument that there are scientists who for some reason disagree with evolution into something that reinforces your own universal claim.